Ken Stuart wrote: > I came across the following new review of Plucker, which goes into > some fairly technical details of flaws in its conversion of web sites:
Pretty much everything the authors says is already known. The 60K image and 30K text record limit being the most important issues. This review, coming from an iSilo community site, is basically preaching to the already-converted. The author is obviously biased. I'm going on a limb here and say that iSilo is indeed a better reader overall, although its particular advantages are not good enough to win me over. Let's face it: Plucker, being an open-source volunteer effort, will always lag behind a product that is developed on a commercial basis. Regards -Laurens _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
