On Mon, Jun 02, 2003, MJ Ray wrote: > Argh! Another option! Well, the other "option" is that I decide how everything should look and work. Personally, I think it is better to leave some of those decisions to the user ;-)
> Why not use bold in the library to indicate unread > documents instead? That's a very good suggestion. We would have to remove the option to use a bold font for the library, but I guess it should be enough to be able to select narrow, normal, or large. Still, considering the amount of code we are talking about (a few lines) we could even make it possible for the user to select whether the strike-through or bold font should be used for read documents. However, since Matto wrote the code I will leave the decision up to him whether the strike-through should be replaced by a bold font or if they should both be included. /Mike _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
