On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:19:49PM +0200, John Marshall wrote: > I'm not sure what you're asking. Yes, 2.2 is the first version of > prc-tools that contains an ARM compiler, so yes of course you need at > least 2.2 if you are using prc-tools. Conversely, the smarts behind > STANDALONE_CODE_RESOURCE_ID is local to prc-tools, so prc-tools, rather > than some generic arm-elf GCC, is indeed required to use this method.
OK. I just wanted to know if I needed to add a check in the configure script to build armlets only if prc-tools >= 2.2 > That is extremely misleading. ".o" means an object file that has not > yet been linked, but the file that the first line above generates has > indeed been linked (though probably not with much :-)). There's a > reason why there's no -c there! The convention for a fully linked > executable is of course to have no extension (or ".exe" if you're into > Windows), and, while it won't make any difference to the tools, making > humans think that your compiled search.c has not been linked will lead > to great confusion IMHO. I thought as much. I just wanted to save myself some work in reorganizing the Makefile. Thanks for your help on this :) -- Adam McDaniel Array.org Calgary, AB, Canada _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
