Robert OConnor asked for details on Alexander R. Pruss' new -fragments feature. (So that it can become configurable from the desktop GUI.)
I would suggest putting it under either Formatting (because it is) or Output - Advanced Options (because people probably will not want to change it very often). > Yes. You have three options: > --fragments=seamless : No "Click here" markers, just > seamless arbitrary length files, with a continuation bit Best for viewers starting when? Does the recently released 1.4 viewer handle it, or do they need a beta from somewhere? Should this become the default for new desktop releases, on the assumption that most people will get a new viewer at the same time? Is there any disadvantage to this, other than backwards compatibility? > --fragments=link : Behaves as before, no > continuation marker, and "Click here markers" Backwards compatible = a safe default? > --fragments=both : Has "click here" markers, and > continuation bit. This means that the viewer will > show the continuation markers, but also show > the next fragment. But if this is also backwards compatible, it is probably a better default than fragments=link. Still not as good as fragments=seamless, if that is safe. -jJ _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
