On Sun, Nov 16, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
> The following hit me this morning: There is no point to caching images in a
> document in RAM--one might just cache handles to save SearchRAMDocument()
> call, but to store full images is a big waste of memory.

I'm not sure I understand this; it takes longer to *uncompress* an
image than to find it...

/Mike

_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev

Reply via email to