From: "Michael Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: > > The following hit me this morning: There is no point to caching images in a > > document in RAM--one might just cache handles to save SearchRAMDocument() > > call, but to store full images is a big waste of memory. > > I'm not sure I understand this; it takes longer to *uncompress* an > image than to find it...
Oops! There goes the brilliant idea: I forgot about compression. Alex _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
