From: "Michael Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2004, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: > > Why not just have a new anchor function that takes two bytes of data > > As I pointed out the anchor function code using 2 bytes of data is > already used for normal anchors.
But we could use a new function code, like 0x9A, and save two bytes each time. It's true that we then lose a function code, but on the other hand documents are smaller. Alex _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
