After the having touble on my home machine (Pentium, Win 95),
I sent up Python 2.1 and Plucker on an even older Win 95 machine,
which took ages as its a 486!

And it worked fine, if a little slow, parsing some local HTML files on the
hard disc.

Unfortunatly, the old 486 does not have a modem so I can't use it to
"Pluck" online content - and besides which it would take ages!

On the Pentium Win 95 Machine (with modem) I tried running without the
background tasks (virus checker, DirectCD, Mouse wheel, etc) and still
had the same errors:

>>Attempting to run a database "hotsync" from the start menu fails with
>>the following error message:
>>
>> Exception ElnOutError im Modul RUNSYNC.EXE bei 0000E518.
>> I/O-Fehler 103.

Dirk replied:

>This means "TOO_MANY_SEM_REQUESTS".
>
>The Program create a Semaphore at startup. This is a little global
>maker that is set and can be accessed by any other program and this
>are deleted by quit the program. I set this, so the Installer can
>detect a running Plucker session and can tell you "Please Quit Plucker
>before installing".

Does this error message mean that Plucker thinks there is already a
Plucker session active?

Where is the Semaphore put?  Is is a "flag file" or a registry entry?
Its possible that I started Plucker once, it crashed/was terminated, and
left the semaphore in place?

>
>I do not know why this fail, i guess you are low of resources. Have
>you tried to reboot the PC?

Any idea what resources?  RAM, Hard disk space?  Registry space?

It occured to me I have been trying to run from either D: or E: because
the C: drive is pretty full - could this be a problem?

And also Python isn't quite right:

>> However, if I try to run PYTHON.EXE, PYTHONW.EXE or W9XOPEN.EXE (with
>> no arguments) from a "DOS Box" (Windows 95 command prompt) I get the
>> following errors:
>>
>> Cannot execute D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON21\PYTHON.EXE
>> or,
>> Cannot execute D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON21\PYTHONW.EXE
>> or,
>> Cannot execute D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON21\W9XOPEN.EXE

>Low Recourses -- Reboot!?

Still like that.

Thanks,

Peter

Reply via email to