On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:11:30PM +0100, Robert O'Connor wrote: > On 24 Sep 2002 at 19:05, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: > > > For plucker-dev people (I'm not on that list, sorry - dont consider myself > > good enough for that), all I did was change two occurrences of "-1" in "def > > process" to "0"s. I am guessing Python arrays start at 0, not 1, but hey it > > seemed to work so I guess I guessed right :-) > > > > Hi, sorry I may have missed the flow of conversation. What was it that you fixed, >was it the > 'depth-first doesn't retrieve all pages' bug?
Precisely. But I couldn't find this bug listed anywhere (in an obvious way) when I posted. Even now, searching for the words "depth" in the subject lines of the plucker-dev archives, as well as in "view all bugs", doesn't show me anything suggestive. But yes that's a good description of the problem and my fix was as described above. Is there any other history to this issue that I should have researched? Thanks, Sitaram _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
