If that's the case, I retract my problem.. All is good! Thanks!
--Wes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurens M. Fridael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: Re: JPluck 0.8.6.2 released > > Update from 0.8.6/0.8.6.1 to 0.8.6.2 > > http://jpluck.sourceforge.net/download/jpluck-0.8.6.2-update.zip > > Some more info is in order here: the ZIP should be extracted with directory > names. This ensures that the JAR files replace those in the "build" > subdirectory. If you don't unpack them this way you end up overwriting one > of the executable JARs. > > The structure looks like this, with file sizes in KB > > jpluckc.jar - 1kb, used only to start JPluck C > jpluckx.jar - 1kb, used only to start JPluck X > build/jpluck.jar - 171kb, JPluck core library <-- This is updated > build/jpluckx.jar -245Kb, JPluck X and JPluck C application files <-- This > is updated > > I'm looking into creating a better patching mechanism. Maybe I'll also > create a Web Start-enabled version (which can auto-update itself by > downloading only the classes that have changed). > > NOTE! Please e-mail bug reports to me directly. Don't send them to the > mailing lists. > > > Thanks > -Laurens > > _______________________________________________ > plucker-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list > _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
