James Madill wrote: > Will you be adding the new table support to JPluck before it > gets put to sleep for the summer?
Unless the 60K table limit in the viewer is resolved I will put table parsing on the back burner. I believe the 60K limit is just too, well, limiting to make tables really useful, especially with 8bpp or higher and on hi-res. (This is not intended as a disparaging remark about Chris's efforts, let me be clear on that.) JPluck will definitely support tables after the hiatus, when I have more time. There are still other issues to resolve right now, and my time is limited. One of these to-do's is segmented image support. I've made preparations so that this can be added easily. We just need to settle on a format specification. Regards -Laurens _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
