On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Laurens M. Fridael wrote: > Unless the 60K table limit in the viewer is resolved I will put table > parsing on the back burner. I believe the 60K limit is just too, well, > limiting to make tables really useful, especially with 8bpp or higher and on > hi-res. (This is not intended as a disparaging remark about Chris's efforts, > let me be clear on that.) JPluck will definitely support tables after the > hiatus, when I have more time.
The multi-image record's ball is in my court now. I'm aiming to have that done by the end of this weekend. Apparently, along with table support, there are a few other things depantant upon this as well :) > There are still other issues to resolve right now, and my time is limited. > One of these to-do's is segmented image support. I've made preparations so > that this can be added easily. We just need to settle on a format > specification. I found a problem with what I proposed, and am working on a solution. I'll send out an email on the plucker-dev list once I find out works in practice. -- Adam McDaniel Array.org Calgary, AB, Canada _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
