> From: "Anne-Gert Bultena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Very slow pluck speed for PIC > Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:25:02 +0200 > Reply-To: [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan J >> Robertson Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:36 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Very slow pluck speed for PIC >> >> >>> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:37:32 -0400 (EDT) >>> From: "David A. Desrosiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Very slow pluck speed for PIC >>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> Perhaps you're being throttled by the server-side for hitting them >>> so fast? >> >> I suppose that may well be the case - would seem to fit with it >> gradually slowing down. Seems a bit funny though that they actually >> give out and encourage use of their /mobile address yet throttle it. >> I'll maybe drop them an e-mail to check. > > But you also said the following: > > "Whilst it's in this 'slow' phase I find that normal internet access > on my machine doesn't seem to work (due to time outs)." > > This would point to a client-side problem, wouldn't it? > > agb
Possibly - I wonder if it's a problem with the Jpluck code - perhaps when it's having to wait a long time for a page it ties up other network access somehow? As I say all other pages (including the /palm pages on PIC) Pluck fine so I think the throttling seems more likely - I agree that this alone shouldn't cause network problems at my end though. No reply from PIC so far, but will post it when I hear. Cheers Alan _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
