That's what I figured. Arch and Ubuntu are big, mainstream distros. Those whose needs are best served by lesser known distros that booted perfectly with mbr might have trouble if they haven't devoted many programmer hours to jumping through not only UEFI hoops, but also bad UEFI implementations from the hardware manufacturer.
And, of course, Secure Boot hasn't even entered the discussion yet. SteveT On Fri, 4 May 2018 20:44:56 -0700 Stephen Partington <[email protected]> wrote: > Same machine with Arch and Ubuntu. > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Steve Litt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Thu, 03 May 2018 23:19:56 +0000 > > Stephen Partington <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have had no issues with UEFI and Linux. The only time I have > > > arguments with it is surrounding the secure boot process and > > > playing nice with windows > > > > Were you using one of the big distros? I'm pretty sure life with > > UEFI isn't as sanguine when you use one of the less used distros. > > > > SteveT > > --------------------------------------------------- > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
