Ted's article remains the gold standard even as it is now a couple years old.
https://flak.tedunangst.com/post/OpenBSD-on-ERL

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:59 AM Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I am now very curious as to the benefits of running OpenBSD vs the Customer 
> Linux that ERLite uses. (goes to do internet reading)
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:36 AM Ed via PLUG-discuss 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The Edgerouter Lite will also run OpenBSD, even has encryption
>> hardware boost available for VPN(but no WiFi).
>> Ubiquiti just (~20200705) EOLd the UniFi-Video product to move folks
>> into a newer product(done badly, hardware drop etc*), but if you don't
>> use UbiFi-Video then no problem...
>>
>> *signs of problems to come?  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23755350
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:59 AM Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have yet to run them in a proper mesh, but the 2.4 to 5 handover is 
>> > really smooth.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:58 AM Michael Butash via PLUG-discuss 
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> How well does Ubiquiti handle things like dynamic channel balancing 
>> >> (figuring out what ap should run on non-overlapping channels), band 
>> >> steering (moving 2.4ghz clients to 5ghz), and roaming features?
>> >>
>> >> Having deployed Cisco/Aruba/Arista/Mist/Aerohive/Meraki they tend to do 
>> >> this, but need some orchestration, which I ass-u-me Ubiquiti *should*, 
>> >> but wondering how much tweaking they allow on the RF side.
>> >>
>> >> -mb
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 7:55 AM Ryan Petris via PLUG-discuss 
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I second the use of Ubiquiti devices, specifically UniFi. While the 
>> >>> management interface is proprietary, you can run it in Docker or as I do 
>> >>> on Debian in a virtual machine. It will automatically discover all 
>> >>> Ubiquiti UniFi devices on the network and allow you to configure them 
>> >>> all through the same interface with the same or different configuration 
>> >>> as the rest. Updates and whatnot all happen through the same interface 
>> >>> and makes managing many of them a breeze; for instance, want to change 
>> >>> your wifi password? Update it in one place and all of your access points 
>> >>> pull in that change.
>> >>>
>> >>> They're not necessarily that expensive either; you can get the UniFi 
>> >>> AC-Lite's on Amazon for $89 each; I have 6 of those and one nano HD 
>> >>> scattered throughout my house and I have yet to roam to a spot that does 
>> >>> not have excellent wifi coverage.
>> >>>
>> >>> They're also all powered via POE so if you're able to run ethernet to 
>> >>> all of them and plug them into a POE switch then you don't have to worry 
>> >>> about a mess of wires.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, at 8:58 PM, Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I have been using Ubiquiti for the last few years. Their edge devices 
>> >>> have been really solid, and the AP I have has been super stable. All the 
>> >>> management software is free as long as you are willing to set up some 
>> >>> containers or vm's which in my mind is rather nice.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:11 PM Michael Butash via PLUG-discuss 
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> A lot of the consumer "mesh" products I find are pretty janky after 
>> >>> review or use.  Not tried Eero, but I did try Samsung mesh AP's for a 
>> >>> bit, and found them mostly inept.  I considered the google units, but 
>> >>> didn't want them uploading everything I do back to google.
>> >>>
>> >>> The term "mesh" tends to imply remote units are NOT wired, and I need 
>> >>> both ideally.  Dealing with a number of wired AP's usually requires some 
>> >>> level of "controller" to orchestrate them, but consumer stuff just 
>> >>> doesn't seem to get how this "should" work...
>> >>>
>> >>> I got the Samsungs a few years ago for the "SmartThings" hub with zwave 
>> >>> integrated, but their wireless was terrible, and only the root AP did 
>> >>> zwave, which I thought would be more distributed across my house.  
>> >>> Apparently whoever developed samsung's wireless had no idea how wireless 
>> >>> works, and would put my 2.4ghz network running most often on channel 5, 
>> >>> all 4 of them, which if you know anything about wireless, you just don't 
>> >>> do that.  You always use channel 1, 6, or 11, really only channels you 
>> >>> should ever use in 2.4ghz.  Not sure how common this is among "consumer" 
>> >>> products.  I crap-canned these after about a year as wireless was 
>> >>> terrible at 2.4ghz and even 5ghz was pretty wack as they seemed to think 
>> >>> using the same channel was a great idea.  Hopefully that person at 
>> >>> samsung got fired.
>> >>>
>> >>> Prior to that, I ran a number of wired Cisco AP's (4-5) around my house 
>> >>> using a Cisco wireless controller appliance for them, which I installed 
>> >>> a lot of across enterprises.  Any enterprise solution you can configure 
>> >>> to use the right channels, and introduce some channel avoidance between 
>> >>> them for proper wireless channel distribution.  In the 2.4ghz range, 
>> >>> with only 3 usable channels (all of which are used by all your 
>> >>> neighbors), you're mostly screwed, but at least at 5ghz should be ok if 
>> >>> they adjust/avoid used channels, and you get some features like band 
>> >>> steering to "influence" devices to move from 2.4 to 5ghz if they behave 
>> >>> right.  Consumer stuff just doesn't seem to do these features sadly, but 
>> >>> good thing you can usually buy old enterprise kit cheap on ebay.
>> >>>
>> >>> I now run a single Arista enterprise AP that does a well enough job of 
>> >>> covering my house for my purposes.  I also have some Fortinet AP's wired 
>> >>> in with my Fortigate firewall as a controller I test with that work both 
>> >>> wired and wireless, but use a different SSID for those.  I mostly use 
>> >>> the Arista for my primary SSID as it's an 802.1ax AP, but the Fortinets 
>> >>> work in full mesh (non-wired) using 5ghz for backhaul or as individually 
>> >>> wired ap's orchestrated via my Fortigate ala my prior Cisco's, and 
>> >>> Arista via the "cloud".
>> >>>
>> >>> I have heard good things about Ubiquiti, but no experience thus far.  I 
>> >>> almost bought into some, but figured I'd screw with the Fortinet and 
>> >>> Arista kit as I work with both lots, and found it best staying with 
>> >>> enterprise kit I can granularly control understanding how wireless 
>> >>> "should" work.  I'd be curious to know how well Ubiuquiti deals with 
>> >>> dynamic channel selection, band-steering, and other "enterprise" 
>> >>> features consumer crap sorely misses on.
>> >>>
>> >>> -mb
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:09 PM Mark Phillips via PLUG-discuss 
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I need to upgrade my home wifi network with a high speed mesh network 
>> >>> (primarily for better phone coverage in my house - I make a lot of video 
>> >>> calls to the UK). I have Cox Gigablast on my wired network. The issue I 
>> >>> am running into is that the "base" unit of the eero units and other 
>> >>> vendors' boxes have to connect to either (1) the cable model or (2) the 
>> >>> router and not the switch. My modem, router, and switch are all in a 
>> >>> cabinet above my desk in the office, so (1) I don't need wifi in the 
>> >>> office and (2) I don't relish the thought of having a wifi transmitter 
>> >>> sitting 3 feet from my head 12 hours a day. I want to connect the wifi 
>> >>> boxes to my wired network in a couple of different rooms away from the 
>> >>> office. Eero (and other vendors) says the "base" unit has to act as a 
>> >>> gateway (my router does that now), so it cannot be after the switch. Any 
>> >>> suggestions on how I can get a high speed mesh network in my house and 
>> >>> not take a daily showert in 2+ GHz radiation? I also want to use the 
>> >>> wired network as the backhaul channel.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please don't start a discussion on the health effects of wifi radiation. 
>> >>> Just assume I am so unscientific and superstitious that I believe in 
>> >>> wifi gremlins and I don't want them invading my head.;)
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> Mark
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from 
>> >>> rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
>> >>>
>> >>> Stephen
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from 
>> > rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
>> >
>> > Stephen
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------
>> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> > https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from 
> rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
>
> Stephen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to