On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 20:03 -0700, eric© wrote: > I'm waiting for RH to sue MS for making false claims that could > negatively impact RH's business. > > eric > > On 10/10/07, David Munson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, the first though I had upon reading that was "Oh really? Then sue!" > > > > > I think that the larger story is corporate responsibility. If Balmer > > > actually believed that Red Hat is infringing on Microsoft's IP, then not > > > to aggressively move to protect their valuable assets would be an > > > abrogation of his responsibility as CEO and Microsoft shareholders would > > > have an actionable complaint against him. ---- if they could prove damages, it would be interesting - though I would have to wonder if a non-technical jury could comprehend technical issues because normally, patent litigation is done in front of a single judge (though not always). The issue is that juries get lost in the technical mumbo jumbo.
Craig --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
