I agree that it is worth learning. I only object to people who decry the
alternatives especially without trying them out enough.


I agree. I have to say, I have tried Anjuta and it is really quite good. Its
just that I prefer using (g)vim and emacs over Anjuta.


Vi is good but it has limitations. One should know it for sure. You will
find
it in almost all unix installations, while same cannot be said about
emacs.


Yes. But personally, I find emacs CC-mode better than vim.


And for beginners I think pico is better than vi. It is almost always there,
at least on linux and has a on screen menubar for helping out. Not to
mention
that it is an editor, not an IDE.


Hmm...I have never used pico for writing code. I should give it a shot.

Kaustubh


--
Kaustubh Gadkari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
______________________________________________________________________
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:      ([email protected])
List Information:  http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail
Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
  • [PLUG] C/C++ IDE ... Varun Mehta
    • Re: [PLUG] C... Shakthi Kannan
    • Re: [PLUG] C... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
    • Re: [PLUG] C... Arun Tomar
      • Re: [PLU... Gitesh Kulkarni
        • Re: ... Kaustubh Gadkari
          • ... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
            • ... Kaustubh Gadkari
              • ... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
                • ... Kaustubh Gadkari
                • ... Harshal Vaidya
                • ... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
                • ... Ashish Belagali
                • ... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
                • ... Shakthi Kannan
                • ... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
                • ... Shakthi Kannan
                • ... श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर
                • ... nipra
            • ... Vaibhav Kulkarni

Reply via email to