On 1/9/07, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GPlv3 makes no difference in this regard. How about just reading http://gplv3.fsf.org instead of speculating?
Cluebat: http://pcburn.com/article.php?sid=1593 Original attribution: http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/15/0331201 I quote:
Richard Stallman Clarifies Source Distribution in GPL v2 Posted on Sunday 16 July @ 00:53:18
*Richard Stallman has clarified what the GPL v2 source distribution clauses
mean. Executive summary: If you distribute binaries on networks, you must also offer the source via the network. If you distribute binaries on CD, you must offer up the source on a companion disk or available via CD to anyone requesting it. * * * *He also makes note that this may be changed with the GPL v3 to allow for a network-only offer of sourcecode, as networks have become both prevalent and reliable in the intervening years since GPL v2 was released. *
Disambiguation was the key word in my earlier post. Go figure. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: ([email protected]) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
