On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:19:20AM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > If you see that the business interest actually translates into > requiring to contribute kernel code, aren't they anyway enhancing the > kernel ?
Never denied that. The term is "key contributor" and it is arrived at on the basis of some count, which is questionable. An analogy: if you are working in a software project, can you call someone who did maximum commit operations in your source code repository as "key contributor"? If yes, I'd just opt out of the debate ... Mayuresh. _______________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
