On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 07:02:28PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Mayuresh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No, because the fact that their business depends on Linux is known. And > > for the same reason, I'd not call MS as "key contributor" just based on > > numbers as how much they depend on Linux is clear as well. > > Linux is one of the business(es) Red Hat is involved in. And, there > are a significant number of technologies where MSFT requires to ensure > that things are interoperable. The kernel isn't that unimportant in an > MSFT scheme of things.
Exactly. "Dependent on" and "not that unimportant" are the words you used, which is what I am trying to say is the difference. Mayuresh. _______________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
