(Ariz, please send your email to [email protected] NOT to [email protected] which has been deprecated in favor of the former.)
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:44:29AM +0800, Ariz C. Jacinto wrote: > since i can't find someone who have a live production file server > using JFS, so i did try it myself. Nothing like being a trailblazer, huh? > so far, JFS did reduced the CPU utilization by 30%, Disk IO by 10 > MBytes per seconds and waiting time (users browsing the files over the > network) by 10 secs (now it's only < 2s) Please give us a profile of your server (CPU, RAM, IO subsystem) and your load (number of concurrent users, profile of activity). Also, these comparisons (reduced CPU utilization and waiting time) are based on previously using what filesystem? > the question is, for how long will it stand? > how about recovery in case of FS failure? > for now, i'll stick to sourceforge's setup > of using different filesystem for each nodes. > file-based replication will be handy for now. I've been an XFS junkie for awhile now, and have been very happy with it as far as general performance and reliability are concerned. If you have the luxury of trying XFS out and letting us know how it fares in your environment, that would be great. --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III : jijo.free.net.ph : When we speak of free software GNU/Linux Specialist : GnuPG 0x93B746BE : we refer to freedom, not price. _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
