Jerome Gotangco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because some users/companies want to have a visible support channel > which redhat provides. If you're going to run business-related > applications that may need some form of assurance, a commercial > product like RHEL can provide that.
Reminds me of Free Grows Revenue - Just Ask Your Carrier http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jonathan?entry=free_like_a_puppy "Because no Fortune 2000 customer on earth is going to run the heart of their enterprise with products that don't have someone's home number on the other end. And no developer or developing nation, presented with an equivalent or better free and open source product, is going to opt for a proprietary alternative." -- Sacha Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - open source, free software geekette http://sacha.free.net.ph/ - PGP Key ID: 0xE7FDF77C interests: emacs, gnu/linux, personal information management, public speaking sachac on irc.freenode.net#emacs . YM: sachachua83 _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
