On 3/24/06, Arys P. Deloso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/23/06, Paolo Alexis Falcone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > > As far as I know, yes. It doesn't mean that the EULA itself in it entirety > > is > > technically legal and enforceable. A clearer look at most proprietary > > software EULAs would show that some provisions can be vague if not illegal > > as > > it borders on the limits of copyright law. MS can't just dictate that the > > licenses are non-transferrable - that's illegal here as well as in most > > territories. > > I guess they just used very restrictive words in the EULA to emphasize > "NO PIRACY" policy, at least mentally. :D > When I read the MS EULA, I felt like being suffocated. > > To be on the safe side, I would stick to the EULA terms. ;-) > > > Arys > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > >
I wonder if these are enforcable... -- www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
