On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 20:25 +0800, Dean Michael Berris wrote: > It doesn't make sense to lower the count of Windows based machines in > government because if it works for them, why do we need to change it?
Because Windows is a very insecure OS? Why should our government pay to safeguard Microsoft's market share? > And if we do put Linux on every government machine, where does the > government get the support for it? Canonical, RedHat, Novell, IBM, > Sun? How is that in line with the government's agenda to help out the > constituency and the local economy? Sticking with Windows doesn't exactly help. _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
