On 8/30/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's not acceptable, the using what works, or the editors listed above?
all of them. im forced to use and i do currently us all of them though. we are all forced to use what works.
> we need nice documents and the ms office way has reached its limits. > the office software market is ripe for takeover and another office > clone is not the solution. I certainly doubt this statement. The MS Office way has reached its limits? Come on...
yes. you notice how the engineers changed from the menu bar to the ribbon in office 2007? because the menubar don't cut it anymore. so many menuitems so little screen space. so many things in windows that show some things dont cut it anymore because there are too many elements to deal with. now how would you like an ms word that has the right combination of automation that you dont even need to press "save as"? i thought things will change when bill gates said that the system will take you directly to your documents without the system getting in the way. windows will be very nice if they actually did that don't you think? the linux engineers are all trying to imitate the mac and windows and totally ignored what bill gates said. it would have been revolutionary. -- things i hate about my linux pc: 1. it takes more than a second to boot up 2. keeps asking about filenames and directories 3. does not remember what i was working on yesterday 4. does not remember all the changes i have ever made 5.cannot figure out necessary settings by itself _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
