Paolo Alexis Falcone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 22:51 +0800, Roger Filomeno wrote: >> Awww. my mistake, i didnt checked it. We were using NATing then CBQ to >> limit bandwith pala. >> >> You may try 3proxy, i think its still on beta but it claims to support >> HTTPS proxying. > > Conceptually, HTTPS proxying is flawed as proxying is a "man in the > middle" which a secure connection (like HTTPS) attempts to avoid.
Re: original post -- Why not just avoid the hassle of figuring out HTTPS transparent proxying etc. and simply block all access to ports 80 and 443 outside of the proxy server? That way, all users are forced to use the proxy --you're going to force that anyway with your transparent proxy. -- JM Ibanez Software Architect Orange & Bronze Software Labs, Ltd. Co. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://software.orangeandbronze.com/ _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
