unfortunately mysql cluster af now is still memory based clustering.. disk baased is still in beta..
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 00:55, Ariz Jacinto wrote: > HA w/o load-balancing? or HA w/ Load-balancing? > > if you're not interested with the load-balancing feature, you should > consider using the mysql replication with heartbeat. although, > you have make changes on the ha.d mysql init script to make > sure that the Master (previously offline) is in sync with the Slave > (current MAIN host) before taking over again as the MAIN host. > > you might also want to try using the MySQL Cluster especially > if you're interested on implementing a load-balancing feature on > your DBs. > > http://www.howtoforge.com/loadbalanced_mysql_cluster_debian > > On 5/15/07, JM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi, > > > > i wanted to implement HA on a DB production environment. i was > > thinking of > > using the following combination: > > > > Heartbeat+DRDB+MySQL > > or > > Heartbeat+RSYNC+MySQL > > or > > ????? > > > > and do you prefer HA over ethernet or HA over a serial cable > > > > are there things that i need to be worried about? > > > > thanks > > _________________________________________________ > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
