JM Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wouldn't go for ZFS until it's integrated into kernel proper instead > of via FUSE). Too much performance concerns to worry about -- and the > possibility of the user mode FUSE daemon dying. Not for / at > least.
How does ZFS compare to, say, a bundle of regular filesystems (ext3, jfs, and yes, even reiserfs, take your pick,) possibly replicated on a Venti[1] store, and served as a single namespace over v9fs (9P2000[2] on Linux, now in the mainline kernel)? Cheers, Zakame Footnotes: [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venti [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9P -- Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
