16Aug2007 (UTC +8) On 8/16/07, Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if you're going to consider using eCryptfs then go with JFS since > both developer from each project are collaborating for its stability > and testing (hint: they both work for Big Blue). > > eCryptfs is available on kernel v2.6.19 and later.
Thanks for the feedback Ariz! That's a good point. I'm pretty much undecided still, but that helps for JFS. > On 8/15/07, Drexx Laggui [personal] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just thinking out loud to get a feel for what's popular out there with > > y'all... We're building an FC7 workstation that would be handling > > several 100+ GB files for analysis. It's going to have a RAID-5 (with > > 1TB x 5 SATA 1.5Gbps HDD's) setup, and needs to have an encrypted > > filesystem... what do you suggest I go with? > > > > The default EXT3? I've been using EXT ever since with Linux, so the > > advantage is familiarity for me. > > > > Should I go bleeding-edge with Reiser4? > > > > Or should I go with the fast(?) XFS? It's been said it's not suggested > > for an encrypted fs, but I really don't know yet. > > > > How about JFS? > > > > I have the option of using FUSE for encrypting the fs, but I'll have > > significant filesystem speed penalties I believe. Drexx Laggui; CISSP, ACFE Associate, CSA, CCSI; Singapore /Manila /California http://www.laggui.com (computer forensics, pentesting, QMS & ISMS developers) PGP fingerprint = 6E62 A089 E3EA 1B93 BFB4 8363 FFEC 3976 FF31 8A4E _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
