Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>From the graph, it seems to me that for 0-600 sec wake > up latency, QNX has a delay of .001846-.001847 sec, > while for Linux for the same 0-600 sec wake up > latency, Linux has a delay of .001840-001849. I am > not sure how to interpret these graphs, but it looks > to me like QNX is quicker at "waking up", while Linux > has much greater variation in response. Is this > interpretation correct? And is the difference > significant for actual real-time behavior?
In a real-time system, you would want bounded behavior, e.g. tasks should wake up within a bounded, defined time. I would expect that this is expected behavior under real-time systems, including QNX, hence the graph (you can notice the bounds there). -- JM Ibanez Software Architect Orange & Bronze Software Labs, Ltd. Co. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://software.orangeandbronze.com/ _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
