Quoting Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > i would definitely go that way (non-journaling filesystem w/o swap) in order > to achieve better performance (assuming distributed data storage > redundancy is > already in place and the machine have lots of room for additional RAM). but > for those who haven't tried it or even thought hard about it, they'll think > you're insane :)
I've used a journaling filesystem (XFS) on a machine where I also disabled swap and didn't have any major issues, so I'm curious about your above statement. Are you saying "go with non-journaling filesystems" for increased performance, in general, or are you saying "go with non-journaling filesystems if you want to run without swap" for increased performance? Please elaborate. Thanks. -- Federico Sevilla III F S 3 Consulting Inc. http://www.fs3.ph _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
