thanks for pointing that out, i appreciate it. what i really meant is to disable swap and /or the journaling-feature (under the same assumptions that i've made earlier).
On Dec 16, 2007 1:31 AM, Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > i would definitely go that way (non-journaling filesystem w/o swap) in > order > > to achieve better performance (assuming distributed data storage > > redundancy is > > already in place and the machine have lots of room for additional RAM). > but > > for those who haven't tried it or even thought hard about it, they'll > think > > you're insane :) > > I've used a journaling filesystem (XFS) on a machine where I also > disabled swap and didn't have any major issues, so I'm curious about > your above statement. Are you saying "go with non-journaling > filesystems" for increased performance, in general, or are you saying > "go with non-journaling filesystems if you want to run without swap" > for increased performance? > > Please elaborate. > > Thanks. > > -- > Federico Sevilla III > F S 3 Consulting Inc. > http://www.fs3.ph > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
