Well yes...as for it being practical, that depends on one's preference. :) For instance my wife and kids usually get annoyed when they grab the keyboard from me and type only to see gibberish on the screen. ha ha
I can type with reasonable speed on QWERTY but I tend to look at the keyboard lest I mistakenly type as if on Dvorak. For me the only downside is that vi (I don't do Emacs, maybe I should?) keys are awfully out of place on Dvorak. ugh. On Feb 9, 2008 4:02 PM, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't deny that Dvorak is faster. However I do question the > practical utility, considering that Qwerty is fast enough for most > people, and developers/sysadmins don't need to type fast (that's what > M-x and completion are for..) > > > On Feb 9, 2008 3:09 PM, Andre John Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .. > > I view my Dvorak experience the same way. At first I slowed down a bit, > but > > now I feel I type faster than I ever did with QWERTY. > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
