Norway's computer experts protesting OOXML - <
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/88536/Computer-experts-protest-vs-Microsoft-document-format-as-standard
>.
Whilst the Philippines claim that the process is transparent, it is not
transparent enough. We need to know details as to who sent 10 comments in
favor, publish the contents of the ISO letter stating that all 7 points have
been resolved, etc.

Now, I am waiting for PLUG's official statement.

==

The Bureau of Product Standards (BPS) has said that its evaluation of a
Microsoft-backed open document format for possible certification as an
international standard was a "transparent process" done in consultation with
private and public sector representatives.

The BPS is the government agency designated to represent the country at the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), which recently
announced <http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123>that
Microsoft's Office Open XML file format had received the necessary votes to
qualify as an ISO standard.

BPS director Jesus Motoomull said in a telephone interview that the agency
created a technical committee led by the Commission on Information and
Communications Technology (CICT) to address seven technical comments that
had initially led to a "no" vote with comments by the Philippines.

The country, through the BPS, eventually voted "yes" based on a consensus
gathered from the members of the technical committee led by the CICT, he
said.

"It was not just a BPS vote," Motoomull said, as he reiterated that the BPS
has always voted based on consensus from local
stakeholders<http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/infotech/view/20080402-127916/RP-votes-for-choice-in-Open-XML-debate>.
He denied that Microsoft had any influence on the agency's vote.

"We didn't decide on our own. We got help from the technical committee. The
basis [for the vote] is the technical committee's expert opinion. We relied
heavily on the technical committee," he added.

Motoomull said the technical committee led by CICT had 15 members. A
majority recommended that the country change its vote from a "no with
comments" to "yes" after the ISO technical committee addressed the issues
that had earlier been raised.

University of the Philippines Department of Computer Science professor
Prospero Naval, however, was not satisfied with the way the country changed
its vote.

"There were a lot of things that were not addressed," said Naval who was a
member of a technical committee led by CICT. He was among those who voted
against the Open XML format.

Naval stressed that while he is not against Microsoft, he wants the BPS to
explain how they changed their vote.

"I will accept a 'yes' vote but they should show me the proof. BPS did not
explain that," he said.

"If the seven comments were addressed, why don't they publish it? They
should be open to the public," he said.

Open XML is a standard format that has replaced the old binary-based format
used by Microsoft for its Office suite of applications: Word, PowerPoint and
Excel. Using the binary format, documents or files are coded to be read only
by Microsoft Office applications. Open XML, however, replaces this, and uses
an open standard (XML) that can now be opened and manipulated by
applications supporting the new format.

"When we voted initially on the Open XML, we voted 'no' with comments
because there were some comments," Motoomull said. These comments were later
sent to an ISO technical committee to inform the body of the country's
concerns.

The ISO technical committee eventually sent back a reply to the BPS, and
informed the agency that six of the seven technical comments had been
addressed.

Motoomull said that since the evaluation of Open XML standard was quite
"technical," the feedback from the ISO was given to the technical committee
led by CICT for review.

Before the March 29 deadline, Motoomull said that the seventh technical
concern was addressed.

BPS sent its "yes" vote to ISO on March 28. "We forwarded our vote to the
ISO Technological Management Board committee," he said.

Motoomull said that there were other sectors not part of the technical
committee who have submitted their position papers to BPS.

"There were 19 official letters supporting Open XML, and nine opposing it,"
he said.
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to