First IMHO this government don't know what transparency really means, second the composition of the OOXML committee is just damn moronic, and third the person who turned the tide in favor of YES is from a government agency (DTI), that same person doesn't even know what the hell is OOXML.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Michael Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 10 April 2008 9:38:27 am Michael Tinsay wrote: > > Not that it was not transparent, but I believe those opposed did not do > as > > much as those MS-backed proponents. There's still the appeals > process... > > If they have to come out in the newspaper and say OH it was transparent > and we > consulted all these people, means that they did not do proper > consultation. > > I never saw anything on it other from the Software freedom group. > > Then when I rang they just kept brushing me off. Never took a message or > posted an email address for us to voice our objections. > > Not transparent.. > > > -- > Regards, > > Michael Cole > LPIC-1 > > > > "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who > can't > read them. " > - Mark Twain > > "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our > abilities." > — J. K. Rowling > > "Wear the old coat and buy the new book." > — Austin Phelps > > "I'm not a teacher: only a fellow traveler of whom you asked the way. I > pointed ahead – ahead of myself as well as you." > — George Bernard Shaw > > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph -- http://jangestre.wordpress.com
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
