On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Ian Dexter R. Marquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that there is a parity overhead when using RAID 5. Just one thing > to consider. I'd go for RAID 0+1, same fault tolerance as RAID 5, but > without the parity, more expensive though (requires at least four (?) > disks).
Yes, and I may need to upgrade my PSU as well to handle four drives. What the heck I'm running? Just lots of VMs for my home lab. So no enterprise, high availability, hardware RAID requirements here. Just want faster I/O for VMs running in parallel. _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
