On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Orlando Andico <[email protected]> wrote: > > And RAC does scale. Not to the clouds, but for almost all practical > workloads it does.
sell your statement that to google, walmart, amazon, bank of america, coca cola, fed ex, etc, etc... and ill be happy for you if they switch... > Nope that's stretching the interpretation of the Wikipedia page. > > I can give some examples of high-profile public references turning > sour internally but I won't. then create your wikipedia page then... author of the page - oracle ... > Yes it is meaningless. But you can't get away with calling people out > as unable to understand something, and then dropping the topic when > YOU get called out. useless... > See. That's the thing. > > You cannot get away with broad generalizations like "RAC exhibits > negative scalability... and it [sic] simply true" without getting > challenged. already explained in my previous posts and another useless debate... > Well yeah this discussion has turned sour and I feel embarrassed to > the PLUG community at large. But I'm not solely at fault here. well to make you happy.. both of us are at fault here.. we ended up in a useless debate... fooler. _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
