On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 20:07, meric mara <[email protected]> wrote:
> First of all we would like to thank Doc Mana for the post and CenPEG for
> standing up and filing this case against the COMELEC to the Supreme Court.
>

I would like to thank Doc Mana and CenPEG as well. I believe that it's
just right that it's in the law that the source code of the AES be
available to any interested party who wants to conduct a review. More
on a personal level, the AES would have my trust if I got a look at
the source code. Whether COMELEC still pays for the acceptance test or
not.


> Second yet foremost, we LAUD and APPLAUD, CenPEG, Doc Mana and the rest of
> the PLUG and Non-PLUG Members who are part of this very relevant, critical
> and important INITIATIVE of which will be written in our history.
>
> In behalf of our team, 8layer, we give high regard and respect to those
> individuals and enities who imbibe and impress in themselves the exercise,
> right and the responsiblity to freedom towards our national sovereignty.
>
> Yes, we would like to make a stand: That we are for the release and review
> of the source code.
>
> We have read most of the forum thread, and of course there are points that
> we do agree on and for some we may not. But we are not writing to discuss
> such points but rather provide our opinion and impression on this very
> notable and important citizen duty of ours.
>
> We would like to believe that all of us would like to have a clean, honest
> and decent election, and by which and through which, our voices are heard to
> name our new leaders of this wounded and "must-heal" society.
>
> And this is why the process of HOW we legitimately choose our leaders is the
> issue at hand. Basically, in the electoral process:
>
> 1. we are presented with choices (candidates vis-a-vis platform of
> governance) etcetera
>
> 2. we go out to vote
>
> 3. we let our vote be counted
>
> 4. we guard our votes.
>
> Correct us if we are mistaken, but when we go into the automated process -
> the 3 and 4 are no longer in the hands of the teachers and the poll watchers
> and the masses but we let the machines mostly take care of this
> process/steps.
>
> Evidently and we should recognize by now (or probably even then), that the
> "counting and guarding obligation" is now in our hands and conscience, to
> PRE-GUARD (sorry for the inventing of new term, for lack of a better word)
> our votes.
>
> PRE-GUARD: On the notion, that we can no longer visually see the counting of
> votes or guard our votes on the day of the election once this AES is ok'd to
> be implemented and on the notion that we are spending a real-deal sum of
> money, for what? all of us can provide countless of reasons, that is why we
> must do it right.
>
> The issues on TRUST must be addressed. TRUST begets TRUST. If the COMELEC,
> doesn't have anything to hide, it shouldn't be difficult from their end to
> release the source code for review.

Based from one of Doc Mana's reply, here's how I see it. COMELEC is
not hiding the source code. It's a licensing issue between COMELEC and
Smartmatic (or Dominion). COMELEC decided not to release the source
code to honor the license from Smartmatic (or Dominion). It is still
COMELEC's fault.

I *suspect* that there could have been an overpricing in the deal. Or
COMELEC doesn't want to spend more for a different license. Or they're
covering for the mistake. // JUST THINKING OUT LOUD - you can set this
aside

Not really asking for more but maybe CenPEG can suggest to COMELEC on
how to do this. I mean if CenPEG hasn't done this yet.

>
> Yes, it may not be all about the quality of the code but about the INTEGRITY
> OF THE CODES per se.
>
> If there are PLUG Members who were part of the programming team of
> SMARTMATIC (pasintabi na po!), this is not about you or your programming.
> This ain't a competition or ego boosting or punching. This is BIGGER than
> you.
>

I'm suspecting that Smartmatic employees might be any the following:
Not allowed to write/speak in behalf of Smartmatic; Or under a
non-disclosure agreement (where it is better off for them to keep
quiet even with a disclaimer).

Will Smartmatic be the one to conduct the customizations to the AES? I
think I read somewhere that Smartmatic will only get binary copies of
the AES from Dominion.

> We all have different attitudes on how to face or react to criticism and
> scrutiny of our work
>
> but as mature and respecting individuals, let us address and look at the
> huge picture here. OUR VOTES. OUR VOICES. OUR FUTURE. OUR NATION.
>
> Let us dwell on our obligations here to guard our votes and stand up for our
> freedom and national sovereignty.
>
> Finally, we support CenPEG's effort and we are with you on this endeavor.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Meric
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to