I don't really see the point why we have this very long threadof arguments
regarding the merits of (A) source code review vs
(B) testing. Both are complementary to ensure software integrity.

If anyone knows here any reference to point that A=B, kindly
point us to that research. YOU cannot just claim that A can
be substituted for B and vice-versa without valid proofs.
credentials cannot substitute for proofs.
I think all of us cannot be fooled by mere arguments without
any statistical or scientific basis. As programmers, we know
logic and sound proof.

Let us say for the sake of argument A=B. This implies that
A-B = B-A = A intersection B. That is a mathematically
strong claim!!! I think, Mr Plameras can enlighten us because
he is a mathematician and he claims this is true. For those
who disagree, it takes only one example to disprove it whereas
Mr. Plameras has to prove all cases.

One case mentioned here is that it is practically impossible to
test for triggers without reading the code. What is trivial for
code review is non-trivial for testing. Assuming we consider the
machine to be a black box, then we have to test for every possible
cases of failure or possible intrusion. Since we do not know
anything about how it functions, we have to test for triggers
with N characters long... and to test it would be N!...
since we don't know how large is N, you will have
to test for N = 1!, 2!, 3!, ..., inf(factorial) possible triggers.
Now, Mr Plameras, is  this even theoretically possible.
Note that this is only to test for triggers. Can we still consider A = B?

Filipinos (locally and abroad) have been known for their computer
skills. I think it is a big slap on our face if we just assume that
the machine to count our vote is just a black box. It is ok if you
are ignorant about computer codes.... but we have the privilege
to be able to look into the technology and help ensure its integrity.

No, you cannot sell us your argument. The issue here is not
about how long you have been in computing, or whatever credentials
you have... the idea that you have more wisdom compared to us by having
a long experience in computing cannot be applied in this setting.
That is a wrong assumption.

you build trust, credibility, and integrity by earning it... by the manner
you speak, the manner you respect the ideas of other people, and
your convictions to search for *truth*.

just my random thoughts,
ppp
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to