On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, hard wyrd <hardw...@gmail.com> wrote: > We can debate about it all we can but the real score is, it's not that easy > as it looks regarding the Android and the Linux kernel. > Let the lawyers discuss it, not end users. Read > this http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=593 > Even Linus Torvalds said that Bionic is not a derived work of the Linux > kernel, and is therefore not covered by the GPLv2. > Oh, and Android is not GPL-licensed. It's Apache Software License (ASL 2.0). > In my opinion, treat Android as a distro using a Linux kernel (GPLv2) and > underlying applications under various licenses. >
exactly -- quarq consulting: agile, open source _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
