>>>>> "m0gely" == m0gely <[email protected]> writes:
m0gely> I like the web interface of DD-WRT. You can still SSH into it m0gely> and I think OpenWRT is more for the cmd line types. Here's what one of the web interfaces look like with Openwrt/LuCI: http://luci.freifunk-halle.net/WebUI/Screenshots/Administration http://luci.freifunk-halle.net/WebUI/Screenshots/Essentials m0gely> I think the activation thing Russel is talking about is only m0gely> for the x86 release. I've never had that on any of my routers. It is easy to evade the activation thing, but the mere existance puts me off. Also, you have to look hard to find SVN access to the ddwrt code base. It isn't linked from the ddwrt website that i could find (Google will find a Trac interface). You can get x86 support or a bunch of others with OpenWrt without even the suggestion of a donation, much less a license fee. In short, OpenWrt feels a lot more FOSSy to me than ddwrt. BTW, there is another one called Tomato that I've heard good things about but never used. You might want to take a look at that also. -- Russell Senior, Secretary [email protected] _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
