For free storage less than 100 MB you might try drop.io
On Friday, July 24, 2009, John Medway <[email protected]> wrote: > With Google you'll be able to send 25 MB attachments anyone who hasn't WAY > overbought/provisioned their email server (like Google has) will reject. > > I understand the desire to move large amounts of data around, but email is > NOT the way to do it. Think of the literal bandwidth required for > transmit/receive + CPU for virus/spam scanning (attachment goes through > Amavis, ClamAV, Amavis, SpamAssassin, Postfix, and then if local Dovecot) x > N users. And this may occur on more than the final recipient host, > depending on server/farm config. > > There are good rea$on$ server admins and IT Departments don't allow large > attachments, unless they had money to burn when provisioning their email > system. > > > > > At 11:00 PM 7/23/2009, Bill Barry wrote: > >>I second the gmail suggestion. You get an smtp server you can use from >>anywhere and you can use 25MB attachments >> >>Bill > > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
