On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:51 AM, David Duncan <[email protected]> wrote:
> For free storage less than 100 MB you might try drop.io > > On Friday, July 24, 2009, John Medway <[email protected]> wrote: > > With Google you'll be able to send 25 MB attachments anyone who hasn't > WAY > > overbought/provisioned their email server (like Google has) will reject. > > > > I understand the desire to move large amounts of data around, but email > is > > NOT the way to do it. Think of the literal bandwidth required for > > transmit/receive + CPU for virus/spam scanning (attachment goes through > > Amavis, ClamAV, Amavis, SpamAssassin, Postfix, and then if local Dovecot) > x > > N users. And this may occur on more than the final recipient host, > > depending on server/farm config. > > > > There are good rea$on$ server admins and IT Departments don't allow large > > attachments, unless they had money to burn when provisioning their email > > system. > > > > > > > > > > At 11:00 PM 7/23/2009, Bill Barry wrote: > > > >>I second the gmail suggestion. You get an smtp server you can use from > >>anywhere and you can use 25MB attachments > >> > >>Bill > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PLUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > Sorry to bring this back up but I thought John might find this useful. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/08/16-apps-that-make-sharing-large-files-a-snap/ _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
