> It would indeed be awesome to have something like this in Portland. PLUG,
> FreeGeek, and a variety of Portland's general-purpose dogooder non-profits
> could team up to give Austin a run for its money -- and help more
> underprivileged gain access to computing resources. I think really we just
> need someone to step forward and spend the time to get it going. I don't
> think that's me, but I'd be quite interested in helping out.
>
>Jameson

I tend to agree with Keith.

If the goal is to give away computers, then Free Geek is already doing
that well.  Their model builds skill and community through giving, in
addition to helping the environment and offering a fun, tech-oriented
thrift store, among other things.  It's a great model.

The Austin folks have their hearts in the right place.  Judging by the
blog posts I read, I would classify what they did (and continue to do)
as "simple" charity.  I may be wrong, of course; I only have the blog
as a reference.  And as Keith wrote, they could build more into the
program in the future.  Perhaps they will put together some statistics
to help refine their approach, or study what organizations like Free
Geek do; hopefully they'll drop the words "against" and "poverty" from
the slogan.  But as it stands, they appear to be feeling more than
thinking.

There's nothing wrong with that, and I'm not flaming them.  Doing nice
things for people feels good.  The problem is that feelings are
subjective.  Installing Linux on old computers and giving them to
"deserving people" feels nice, whether these are local people we
classify as low-income, or low-income people in developing nations.
And you can tell by the blog posts on the Austin folks' site that
doing what they did felt good; they respected each other more, and
some deserving people received computers as gifts.

But whether an act that feels nice is actually useful depends on the
cost of the act versus the gain.  Free Geek has done an excellent job
drilling down into this trade-off.  They've defined their charity in a
complex way that strategically hits many points: computers, training,
recycling, etc., making the absolute most of the gains they get from
the costs their program incurs.  Therefore the program has become much
more than an opportunity for big businesses to write off the
depreciated value of outdated computers -- even more than a chance for
deserving people to get "free" computers.

This has unexpectedly become a long post.  The reason is that I am
naturally suspicious of simple charity because it often creates more
problems than it solves.  For example, as Keith said, if someone
doesn't know how to use the operating system on their free computer,
they may steal a copy of Windows and install it.  Or worse, they may
not even use the computer; it could end up in a dumpster where it
certainly won't be recycled.

Full disclosure: I launched my own simple charity in Ghana a few years
ago -- opening a computer-training school for children in a rural
village, giving away computers.  Hopefully I am not projecting my
experience onto "Linux Against Poverty"; but what I found out in Ghana
was that doing useful, good charity is extremely difficult.  My
project there made me feel good at the time, but in all honesty, I
doubt it had much impact; it may have even had a negative impact,
which I think is true for most simple charities.

So, my rambling and potentially flammable point is that doing good
(complex) charity requires the kind of drilling down that Free Geek
has obviously done.  If you want to give away computers, I'd suggest
working with them.

However, not all Linux geeks in Portland should volunteer at Free
Geek.  There's always room for another non-profit in this city.  Maybe
it's a technology program that helps low-income and at-risk children
get experience with computers.  Maybe it's something else -- something
you are passionate about.  But hopefully it's not a program that gives
away computers because with Free Geek doing its thing so well, that
would be like reinventing the wheel.

Best,
Andrew Brookins
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to