Mike Connors wrote: > What I don't understand is why so many small to med bizs still run > Microsoft. The job descrips are usually the same: MS Server 2003/2008, > Exchange, Active Directory, Office. Is this just by default? Are they
I think your first sentence is key. "I don't understand". You act as if there is no value in the products and technologies you listed. > not interested in saving money? Don't they want performance, > reliability, a custom solution that best fits their needs? Don't they > care about supporting a talented, creative, local economy by seeking out > FOSS solutions? Without even stepping foot inside their door you already have the best fit for their needs? And you said "saving money" and "custom solution" in almost the same sentence. This is too vague regardless of platform, and comes with it's own set of liabilities. > I wish I could go into every one of these bizs and show them what Linux > is capable of and then hook them up with talented people who could > customize OS/package builds and maybe even develop custom FOSS apps as > needs dictate. You make it sound so simple. :) Can you offer a practical example of what you mean by the above, and how maintenance fits in? Don't get me wrong. Microsoft does things that confound me to no end. I'm only a Linux hobbiest, but all my edge appliances run OpenBSD, and all my web/db/app servers run FreeBSD. I'm fine to recommend and implement OSS where it makes sense. -- m0gely _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
