I have been running the beta version of flash (64 bit) for about a week on my laptop which has an ATI graphics chipset and on my desktop with an nVidia chipset and had no problems. In fact, I have only had problems with the version of flash from the repositories. What kind of issues are you having?
I am running Kubuntu 10.10 on all my systems and am considering replacing my nVidia card with an ATI simply because they work so well. The open source Radeon driver seems to work quite well aside from power saving features (which rules out the use of it on my laptop) so I too am using the closed source fglrx driver. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Michael C. Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > The betas for flash just don't seem to work at all for me. > Lightspark is a beautiful concept, but not yet anything more than that. > I'm stuck using the proprietary Catalyst driver, come on AMD. > High end video cards for which there are open source drivers are going > to be more popular than cards that only work with closed source drivers. > Why has the video card market contracted so badly and why does NVIDIA > have a defacto monopoly at this point? I am not happy with NVIDIA and > I'm sure I'm not alone. The problem with keeping the specs closed is > that Microsoft gets an unfair advantage over Linux let alone other OSes > such as Syllable Desktop and Visopsys. > > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
