Hi Wes,
Thanks for the heads-up. I can assure you i am not doing anything "crazy"... Perhaps something in the email was causing gmail to flag it as spam (keywords or links). I have removed the configs and links from this email. Hopefullt that will enable it to get through. I noticed that both of my emails did make it to the Archives page. If anyone is willing to help me with my original question, the original email may be in your spam folder, or perhaps you could utilize the February 2011 Archives on the pdxlinux website. Once again, thank you for any assistance you may be willing to offer! Best regards, Daniel M. Head "/If we want to set our lives aright and find peace, it is not the tolerant attitude of others that will do it for us. It will come about, rather, by our learning how to show them compassion./" - John Cassian On 2/2/2011 12:33 PM, wes wrote: > I don't know why, but Gmail is flagging your messages as spam. > Whatever crazy thing you're doing, I suggest you knock it off :) > > -wes > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Daniel M. Head wrote: > > Hey all, > > I tried to send this yesterday, but was having some issues with the > wireless network. I didn't receive it from the list, so I'm resending. > Any suggestions on what the problem may be would be _greatly_ > appreciated. If others have already received this, please accept > my most > humble apologies. > > > I have the openvpn client rules set up (as per my question earlier > this > week - thank you again EJ), and the correct virtual ip is being > assigned > to my test account when i connect through openvpn. > > Now, I am trying to restrict that test account to only be able to > access > one specific server. All other traffic of any form should be > allowed. As > it is, my test account is not able to access anything except the > openvpn > server itself. If I turn iptables off, everything is talking to > everything again. > > Here is the output of the iptables file (I have also added comments to > the five custom entries I made in iptables. Also, IPs and names have > been changed, not that it matters, no one could identify anything > with a > private IP.): > > > > It was my understanding that iptables read rules from the top > down, and > that once a rule condition was met, it skipped any further rules. Does > anyone see a problem with the above? Thanks in advance! > -- > Best regards, > Daniel M. Head > > "If we want to set our lives aright and find peace, > it is not the tolerant attitude of others that will do it for us. > It will come about, rather, by our learning how to show them > compassion." > - John Cassian > > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
