this one came "From" a different address, so I'm afraid I'll have to suggest
again that you are doing something... not straightforward.

However, this one did come through correctly.

I wish I knew something about iptables which could help you.

-wes

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Daniel M. Head <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Wes,
>
>
> Thanks for the heads-up. I can assure you i am not doing anything
> "crazy"... Perhaps something in the email was causing gmail to flag it
> as spam (keywords or links). I have removed the configs and links from
> this email. Hopefullt that will enable it to get through.
>
> I noticed that both of my emails did make it to the Archives page. If
> anyone is willing to help me with my original question, the original
> email may be in your spam folder, or perhaps you could utilize the
> February 2011 Archives on the pdxlinux website.
>
> Once again, thank you for any assistance you may be willing to offer!
>
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel M. Head
>
> "/If we want to set our lives aright and find peace,
> it is not the tolerant attitude of others that will do it for us.
> It will come about, rather, by our learning how to show them compassion./"
> - John Cassian
>
> On 2/2/2011 12:33 PM, wes wrote:
> > I don't know why, but Gmail is flagging your messages as spam.
> > Whatever crazy thing you're doing, I suggest you knock it off :)
> >
> > -wes
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Daniel M. Head wrote:
> >
> >     Hey all,
> >
> >     I tried to send this yesterday, but was having some issues with the
> >     wireless network. I didn't receive it from the list, so I'm
> resending.
> >     Any suggestions on what the problem may be would be _greatly_
> >     appreciated. If others have already received this, please accept
> >     my most
> >     humble apologies.
> >
> >
> >     I have the openvpn client rules set up (as per my question earlier
> >     this
> >     week - thank you again EJ), and the correct virtual ip is being
> >     assigned
> >     to my test account when i connect through openvpn.
> >
> >     Now, I am trying to restrict that test account to only be able to
> >     access
> >     one specific server. All other traffic of any form should be
> >     allowed. As
> >     it is, my test account is not able to access anything except the
> >     openvpn
> >     server itself. If I turn iptables off, everything is talking to
> >     everything again.
> >
> >     Here is the output of the iptables file (I have also added comments
> to
> >     the five custom entries I made in iptables. Also, IPs and names have
> >     been changed, not that it matters, no one could identify anything
> >     with a
> >     private IP.):
> >
> >
> >
> >     It was my understanding that iptables read rules from the top
> >     down, and
> >     that once a rule condition was met, it skipped any further rules.
> Does
> >     anyone see a problem with the above? Thanks in advance!
> >     --
> >     Best regards,
> >     Daniel M. Head
> >
> >     "If we want to set our lives aright and find peace,
> >     it is not the tolerant attitude of others that will do it for us.
> >     It will come about, rather, by our learning how to show them
> >     compassion."
> >     - John Cassian
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to