On May 6, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Russell Senior wrote: > For me, it is much less about aspect ratio or physical dimensions than > it is about the number of pixels. The newer models are giving you > *fewer* pixels (in particular, vertically) than they used to while > they blather on with their marketing distractions.
How do you figure? The typical 20" 4:3 monitor would have a native resolution of 1280x1024. Normally, you would replace that with a 22" 16:9 monitor. The typical 22" 16:9 monitor would have a native resolution of 1680x1050. All I want is something I can look at and not get a headache while doing so. Russell Johnson [email protected] _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
