>>>>> "RJ" == Russell Johnson <[email protected]> writes:
RJ> On May 6, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Russell Senior wrote: >> For me, it is much less about aspect ratio or physical dimensions >> than it is about the number of pixels. The newer models are giving >> you *fewer* pixels (in particular, vertically) than they used to >> while they blather on with their marketing distractions. RJ> How do you figure? RJ> The typical 20" 4:3 monitor would have a native resolution of RJ> 1280x1024. RJ> Normally, you would replace that with a 22" 16:9 monitor. RJ> The typical 22" 16:9 monitor would have a native resolution of RJ> 1680x1050. I was referring to modern laptops. Options on desktop monitors is better. I apologize for the context misalignment. -- Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.'' [email protected] _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
